Can you provide a link with him saying that, that would be so helpful for me as I try to talk about this to people.
The initial principal investigator of W.H.O.'s ivermectin meta-analysis is on tape saying that there is 1 chance in 5,000 that ivermectin does not work. However he is ethically comfortable to let 15,000 patients in placebo arms suffer, and even die, for the sake of bureaucrats. https://twitter.com/DrAndrewHill/status/1407794264969523200 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What happened to the Hippocratic Oath? Oh, I guess ethics don’t apply if one isn’t a physician. I imagine in 2030, the WHO will still be saying there is insufficient evidence for
#ivermectinThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
On basis of WHAT, were all these trials started? Surely it must have been already fairly compelling evidence!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DrTedros Are you aware of this? you cannot pretend you don't knowThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
nevermind that the v.a.x approval test were on 10,000 ppl only... for Ivermectine we need 100,000... coz you know...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's used for roundworms and parasites and is safe in that area. High doses are needed for covid with a fair amount of adverse reactions. Research is in its use for covid is about a year old. Not enough data yet. Better to be safe than sorry.
-
Higher doses aren't needed for Covid. See what they did in Mexico City (I think it was 6mg for everyone).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.