Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
So, I tried by myself to plot this figure with data from wikipedia. I find similar trends for countries using chloroquine (dashed lines) but you forgot other countries (bold lines) that do not use chloroquine and obtained better results... Life is not easy, sorry...pic.twitter.com/6UWZvu7kkC
Israel is drowning in off-label chloroquine use. It has received 2 million doses from Teva mid-April and has only 16,000 cases. Message from their Prime Minister below. Thailand treats the at-risk population with chloroquine as well. Protocol below.pic.twitter.com/C51gVnrieS
For israel, they received the 10 of April chloroquine to perform tests (https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/israel-pm-netanyahu-thanks-india-pm-modi-delivering-hydroxychloroquine-to-israel-1665302-2020-04-10 …). 12 days they canceled the test because "a higher percentage of coronavirus patients given hydroxychloroquine died than those who received regular care'" (https://www.timesofisrael.com/malaria-drug-stockpiled-by-israel-shows-no-benefit-in-virus-treatment-study/ …)
For Thailand, I am not convinced by the document you share. I guess it is just a protocol for the trial (https://sea.mashable.com/science/9914/who-set-to-run-clinical-trial-for-coronavirus-treatments-in-over-70-countries …) but not for a large scale use of chloroquine. And what is your explanation for Belarus, Australia, and Luxembourg?
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
