Stephen Jay Gould the neo-lysenkoist was exposed for the fraud his "Mismeasurement of Man" was already 1983, why then do intellectuals still see him as the go to guy? "Neo-Lysenkoism, IQ, and the press" - National Affairs 1983 http://bit.ly/2qytqsk @jason_pontin
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jason_pontin
That's exactly the bullshit Strawman smear Gould tried to pull on Murray and Herrnstein. Didn't work then, work even less today.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jason_pontin @aClassicLiberal
Repeating an obviously wrong assertion with an ! after it doesn't improve your argument As far as the racial differences in avg IQ - they are massively important in social outcomes and in fact are far more important on a social level than any individual variation
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jason_pontin @aClassicLiberal
Nope, you left the ! off the (unbelievably stupid) assertion that there are no races - doesn't stand up
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @jason_pontin @aClassicLiberal
Nope, still no ! - sad. ...and it isn't about genetic drift - it's about *selection* for different traits in different environments. That's why every single measurable physical trait differs by race and ethnic group as does every single measurable mental trait
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
"Individuals vary by more than group averages" is a true and meaningless statement
Men vary more in height than they area taller than women - no shit, now when you manufacture pants for men and women how long are you going to make a medium? 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.