I wish you had spent a second engaging with Harris's claim that the data is uncontroversial. If you'd taken his separation framing you could have more convincingly leveled the critique that the observed IQ differences between races are caused by racial inequality, not vice-versa
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @rorydaithi @ezraklein
There is no such convincing critique, and most of the experts in this field reject environment-only explanations for group differences:pic.twitter.com/382etOQAtN
0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, what he's saying is far stupider - he's saying that without genetics you CAN'T TELL WHICH PEOPLE ARE JAPANESE
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
How about observable traits like brain size? Pelvic opening? Brain sphericality? Only every single measurable trait differs but you can't say anything conclusive until all the specific genes are id'ed - horse and dog breeding predate this knowledge so, of course, never happened
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Guess what human civilization does to humans? Selects for outcomes in observed traits - like intelligence and behavior
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.