I wish you had spent a second engaging with Harris's claim that the data is uncontroversial. If you'd taken his separation framing you could have more convincingly leveled the critique that the observed IQ differences between races are caused by racial inequality, not vice-versa
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @rorydaithi @ezraklein
There is no such convincing critique, and most of the experts in this field reject environment-only explanations for group differences:pic.twitter.com/382etOQAtN
0 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No, what he's saying is far stupider - he's saying that without genetics you CAN'T TELL WHICH PEOPLE ARE JAPANESE
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
>Observable traits like epicanthal folds being minor superficial exceptions. Defend this. Why are the "superficial" differences allowed to be clearly heritable? How do you know it's not culture that makes them have different eyes without total knowledge of every gene's effect?
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Intelligence is just as obvious and easily studied
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.