Not even gonna pretend to understand why this is a Boomhttps://twitter.com/natashabertrand/status/926502457911529472 …
Not to be confused with 2001 Nobel Peace Prize winner Kofi Annan. 54th Clause of the Magna Carta absolutist. Commentary from an NRx perspective.
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more
By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.
| Country | Code | For customers of |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40404 | (any) |
| Canada | 21212 | (any) |
| United Kingdom | 86444 | Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2 |
| Brazil | 40404 | Nextel, TIM |
| Haiti | 40404 | Digicel, Voila |
| Ireland | 51210 | Vodafone, O2 |
| India | 53000 | Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance |
| Indonesia | 89887 | AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata |
| Italy | 4880804 | Wind |
| 3424486444 | Vodafone | |
| » See SMS short codes for other countries | ||
This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.
Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.
When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.
The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.
Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.
Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.
Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.
See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.
Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.
soncharm Retweeted Natasha Bertrand
Not even gonna pretend to understand why this is a Boomhttps://twitter.com/natashabertrand/status/926502457911529472 …
soncharm added,
If an organization ever releases an edited document they're never to be believed. Unlike the rest of the media Wikileaks had never done that
Therefore, completely discredit wikileaks based on this report from the media 
but i don't even..what do i even care if "Guccifer 2.0" is "discredited" what do they think was hinging on Guccifer 2.0 being credible?
If true then wikileaks is "discredited". By that standard every media org is "discredited" but fuck you, they're the nyt and you're not
Every time there's a story they don't want to cover in a wikileaks dump they ignore it b/c wikileaks is "discredited" This used to work
But Wikileaks is just a clearinghouse for leaked stuff, it's the source of the stuff that is either credible or not
So if they convince me "Guccifer 2.0" doctored some of that stuff..not sure why I care? What do they think relied on none being doctored?
Not even sure i understand when/how it was established that G2.0 was 'Russian'
This is their thinking: Guccifer 2.0 doctored a doc = wikileaks published a fake document = wikileaks is "discredited" = can dismiss WL
It's not honest, it doesn't follow and if you use the same reasoning it applies to every media org but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ They control the megaphone
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.