Dude, you're just blatantly lying now. I don't even see the point, as anyone who googles these cases and goes directly to the trial summaries (especially for the Ga case) can easily see how full of crap you are.
-
-
Should be no problem for you to post a quote from one of these judgements about there being insufficient evidence if you've read the cases, right? Wonder why you didn't start with that instead of a vague "courts dismissed the cases". (because you're lying is why)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I really don't understand why you'd be so stupid as to make a claim like that knowing that I'd be able to, unless you're just completely ignorant about the topic outside of Newsmax segments. https://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-judge-dismisses-trump-campaign-case-in-chatham-ballot-dispute/YKBA6IYQKBB4JCSQEIJBQQT6QI/ …pic.twitter.com/ddpirLNC83
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
First, link to the case and not a media report - the important part isn't the words - it's the actual evidence. Second - some (D) judge throwing out a case has as much weight as saying that (D) poll workers counted the ballots and found, yep, their own count was correct.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
lol Way to move the goalposts. You literally asked for a judgement that dismissed the evidence. Sad! And that quote is a direct excerpt of the judgement, genius. Quit embarrassing yourself.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mongymongmongy @CovfefeAnon and
And, btw, the plaintiff's evidence was dismissed because it turned out to be total BS once all the people involved were called to give sworn statements.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
>was dismissed because You don't get to make claims about why something was dismissed without linking the actual decision.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Really? The decision has "his order said" as part of it? Or that's a link to a news story that may or may not have any relationship to the actual decision beyond a pull quote. (it's the latter)
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
The decision was literally quoted verbatim you absolute clown. Specifically, the part where the judge ruled that the plaintiffs provided no real evidence despite their crazy claims. This is sad, dude.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
It's a single sentence - that's not a decision.
-
-
Yeah, the decision was that the case was dismissed for lack of merit. As the sentence specified, a lack of any evidence to back up their claims was one of the reasons the judge gave for the dismissal, even after the plaintiffs made their fraudulent efforts. Jesus Christ.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Gonna explain this one more time. Court decisions: Are (often) more than a sentence long Explain the reasoning behind the holding Are not published in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, are published in court document repositories
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.