With control over trillions of dollars and America's foreign policy at stake, why WOULDN'T a party steal an election when they know the corporate press won't cover it - actually, will censor all discussion of it - even if they get caught?
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @martyrmade
You're so much smarter than this, man. You're relying on purely empty speculation on possible motives because you know how ridiculous the cases Trump's cronies presented in court were, the audit results, etc. Real clown world stuff.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mongymongmongy @martyrmade
If only we were as smart as the guys who see voting stop simultaneously in 4 swing states, poll watchers get kicked out, windows get boarded up, then hours later tens of thousands of net biden votes popping up, and think "yep, that seems legit".
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @nan_point @martyrmade
Again, before parroting this absolutely insane stupidity, why don't you read up on how this claim was eviscerated in court, once the standards of evidentiary scrutiny and testimony under oath were applied to it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mongymongmongy @martyrmade
What "claim"? I watched it happen in real time. "Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?"
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @nan_point @martyrmade
Oh, random anonymous internet stranger? All of the video footage, wtiness testimony under oath, documentation, etc. was scrutinized thoroughly for the judicial record, and those claims were torn apart, but you saw otherwise? Where were you when they needed you on the stand?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Wow, if the claims were "scrutinized and torn apart" you should be able to point to exactly what this devastating evidence that destroyed the claims was, right? Doctored videos in all those states? Mass hallucination about simultaneous pauses in the counts? Please let us know.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
The videos weren't "doctored"--it's what Trump's team claimed truncated clips of those videos showed that was false. ALL of the footage, sworn testimony, documentation, etc. was reviewed in court, where, unlike on Fox, people can't lie w/ impunity w/o risking consequences.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
>ALL of the footage, sworn testimony, documentation, etc. was reviewed in court Just factually wrong. None of this was "reviewed in court" - none of the cases got to the point where factual findings were made. Which specific case was dismissed after an evidentiary hearing?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
LOL, what a disingenuous thing to post to fool people who don't know how trials work. Why did these cases not make it that far, again? You know the answer, and that answer is actually even more damning.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No, you see one of us here is a liar and it's you. No court "heard evidence and dismissed it" they all manipulated procedural outcomes to come up with excuses as to why the cases shouldn't be heard and then you imply that it's b/c of insufficient evidence b/c you're a liar.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.