Good point, there are no examples I can think of where anyone has portrayed #eugenics positively in fiction.https://twitter.com/asbdahfg/status/1451190937179148288 …
-
-
Replying to @RokoMijic
C'mon Roko - gonna lose your nerd card for this one. Dune and a movie version was even released recently.
4 replies 0 retweets 50 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @RokoMijic
Seveneves. Doesn't portray positively or negatively. More neutrally as a fact of the future.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Anyways I think both dysgenics and eugenics are dumb concepts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @RokoMijic @RukawaVa
There's no answer to that question that doesn't boil down to "magic"
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @RokoMijic
50% of the human population is already eugenicists and has been practicing eugenics on a world wide scale for hundreds of thousands of years. We call them women.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Our eugenicists evaluate the whole human in a social context and spend months doing it. And they are very picky. And they all have there own ideas of constitutes the best. You would replace this with something more expert and bureaucratic? Trust the experts? Or bureacrats? Lol.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RukawaVa @RokoMijic
This is laughably wrong. Eurasian women have not had sexual freedom of choice for at least 50k years and so their mate evaluation algorithms are not precisely attuned to positive traits. Example:pic.twitter.com/gp0oX8fuQv
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
It would have been more accurate to say that men are the eugenicists
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Men rank each other, top men get what men see as top women. Men's rankings are kept in accord with reality because if they drift too far the tribe loses a war and all its women (and the men die).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.