Razib, I read your post, and I buy the arguments behind why in our society of stratified privilege, eliminating standardized testing will advantage those with connections.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @terminalyonline @razibkhan
However, isn't this counterbalanced by the fact that what we're selecting for with standardized testing isn't actually IQ (even if you believe that's a good measure of intellectual worthiness)? It seems like the number one factor is parental educational attainment?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @terminalyonline @razibkhan
By eliminating the ACT, for example, there's a trade-off. On the one hand, you get rid of a test that's hard to fake (although Varsity Blues shows that people with means will try), and more spoiled rich slackers go to elite universities.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @terminalyonline @razibkhan
But on the other hand, a bunch of naturally gifted people with high-IQ but low test scores due to confounding environmental factors like family instability, language barrier etc. now have a fighting chance to learn alongside the elite?
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @terminalyonline @razibkhan
Standardized test were, and are, good at finding the bright kids, whether they come from money or not. Getting rid of them eases the way for people with pull, which is why getting rid of them is happening.
1 reply 19 retweets 69 likes -
This is still the optimistic take - that decisions are being made for a sensible if socially sub-optimal reason. A different take is that they want to exclude intelligence because intelligent people cause all kinds of problems as the orthodoxy gets stupider and crazier.
2 replies 2 retweets 29 likes -
It's more complicated than expressed in that tweet of mine, but that 'different take' is entirely wrong.
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @gcochran99 @CovfefeAnon and
It might not be the only reason, but it's certainly a big part. Children of the elites will regress towards the mean, and nepotism is a natural human instinct. "Holistic admissions" in the name of racial justice provide a convenient excuse for the absence of transparency.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @HyperDupont @CovfefeAnon and
Children of elites have always regressed towards the mean, but in 1970 white liberals could tolerate meritocracy and in 2021 they can't. While we're at it. on a lot of things, meritocracy hasn't worked very well. SAT doesn't measure resistance to the crazy.
3 replies 4 retweets 29 likes
They've been selecting to maximize enthusiastic adoption of crazy (with an SAT floor) for quite a while. The refinements of their process have been aimed at getting more and more rigorous at the first part.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.