They haven't engaged with us in a long time - not since it became clear that they were losing the argument and hence sending people to our side by engaging. Since that revelation, silence.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @XYZcartographer @UDepravity
I am as well - because I know we're right on the areas where we differ and they get hysterical trying to defend their positions on those topics. That said, a major difference is at the meta level - the implications of them being unable to speak of the actual conclusions and why.
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @XYZcartographer @UDepravity
If someone is a nameph*g he made a prediction about the direction of the culture when he established his online identity. By 2021 I think it's clear to everyone that that prediction was incorrect.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
He wasn't a namefag, just insufficiently paranoid. Didn't compartmentalize very strictly, posted about similar stuff under real name and pseudonym.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Same thing really. "Insufficiently paranoid" just means "made a bad guess as to what the future would look like".
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.