Liberal democracy is bad because of a chain of implications: Politics need teams Coalitions need gibs To give gibs you need to take them from someone To take from someone you need to morally elevate the receiver and denigrate the ones getting robbed (continued)https://twitter.com/pompilivs/status/1428265323782881280 …
-
-
Nigeria solved this problem by killing the more productive groups when they tried to make their own countries after getting shafted.
-
That works until you collapse to the point where you get invaded by your neighbors - see Pol Pot as an example.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
“Group?”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can exploit the less productive tho, it's called colonialism
-
I don't think you really need part B tbh, the requirement for factions that attempt to mutually exclude each other from a putatively unitary polity is sufficient
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
ez, have homogeneous country
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pretty much
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What do you make of this in US context. Candidate needs massive donations form billionares and corporates to win elections.


Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What do you need to solve exactly?
-
Me? Nothing. People who think "liberalism" or "liberal democracy" is a stable form of governance that doesn't inevitably result in a massive racial spoils system need to "solve" this tendency.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.