Again, Eigen is the absolute worst of the post-rats, and I have absolutely no idea why anyone finds him interesting. This is just a giant de facto refutation of "virtue ethics"https://twitter.com/eigenrobot/status/1427497175211077636 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @17cShyteposter
At least if these people had the decency to say that they want to bring in these people because they hate you and that they give money to bail paying charities because they hate people and want to see more crime that would be honest.
1 reply 0 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @17cShyteposter
This isn’t the same group giving money to BLM bail funds
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DogIsABot @17cShyteposter
Not BLM rioting bail funds - regular criminal bail funds - you know, murderers, people who randomly attack people, etc. On more than one occasion Scott Alexander gushed about how wonderful charitable giving to pay for more criminals on the streets is and Eigen is in that sphere.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @17cShyteposter
Judicial processes are too slow If someone can’t make $500 bail for a nonviolent petty misdemeanor, shows up to court having a charity cover bail seems fine to me. issue I have is I suspect most of these funds mislead about how many people given bail make court dates.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DogIsABot @17cShyteposter
This is what that "charity" is paying for. At least admit that you're doing this because you want to see whites terrorized via attacks on their elderly parents and grandparents. No one gets jailed for "non violent, petty misdemeanors".https://www.foxnews.com/us/man-accused-of-shoving-elderly-nyc-woman-has-been-arrested-over-100-times …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @17cShyteposter
I’m not donating to such funds. To do so I would have to be confident that money wouldn’t go to such people. And people do go to jail for driving with an drug offenses, shoplifting etc. In such cases helping someone who can’t make bail does seem to me to be a good.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DogIsABot @17cShyteposter
You can be confident that money will go to such people. That's the appeal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @17cShyteposter
It absolutely is not. That is why left-wingers try to stop stories like the above from being distributed or reported on. Because that is not the imagery they want in people's heads. They have to avoid that to conjure support.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Of course it is. They just want a plausible deniability. You think this is new? Go read Radical Chic by Tom Wolfe. The appeal is that they'll explicitly deny that they want to fund crime and yet all the funding will just so happen to go to "charities" that do exactly that.
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @17cShyteposter
Maybe that’s what a small activist core, but most libs and progs? absolutely not. Rather for most of the PMC it as a type of virtue signaling feedback loop, people want to indicate they are so altruistic that they can’t imagine someone behaving maliciously.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
such signaling benefits the individual and damages the commons.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.