The key is who has the power to decide upon a direction and issue the rewards/punishments necessary to effect shifts in the policy creation process. My analysis is based in the observation that only oligarchs or NatSec executives pay enough people to pull such a thing off.
-
-
Replying to @joeldavisx @bespokecommie and
The role of journalists/academia isnt to sure up the structural power of journalists/academia, but the command structure of the State (natsec) and dominant investors in the economy (oligarchy). Geopolitical and Financial domination, the two central processes at play here.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @joeldavisx @bespokecommie and
You dont need to invent some pseud-BS Moldbug style about the mimetic mind virus "religion" of the "cathedral" to explain this. Cold hard rationality reveals the incentive chain.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @joeldavisx @WindReign and
You kind of do though, its frankly insane to posit that people are embracing sodomy, dog moms, and child sacrifice only due to it favoring centralization and power maximization. Pray tell, why wasn't the emperor of Ming China attended to by trans women of color then?
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @bespokecommie @WindReign and
Feminism, Abortion and LGBT "normalization" were all policy agendas promoted by the Oligarchy's foundations, they weren't "spontaneous" developments. All three things serve structural goals, they create more dependent demographics that become clients of the bureaucracy.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @joeldavisx @WindReign and
Now you're just bullshitting: 1. I never said they were spontaneous, just that mere power maximization isn't enough to justify them.2. All of these things except maybe LGBT (which is debatable because it got medically classified in like 1850) far predate any globalist oligarchy.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @bespokecommie @WindReign and
Power maximization is more than enough motive for the elite donor class, yes. Do you think they are sincere libtards? If the powerful felt it would benefit them more to retvrn to traditional values, they could easily fund a political movement into existence to achieve that.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @joeldavisx @WindReign and
Putin and Jinping are good examples of this, commies who are now obviously not commies. But, people such as me and
@CovfefeAnon believe this happened not because the oligarchy changed course but because the intellectual/priestly class died or was replaced.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @bespokecommie @joeldavisx and
Sitting_on_my_Own Retweeted Sitting_on_my_Own
The below scenario in America will not happen until tanks in Harvard Yard, the intellectuals kill each other à la Great Purge, or lapse fully into Brezhnevite decadence. Oligarchs have nothing to do with it. I will end here, we agree to disagree.https://mobile.twitter.com/bespokecommie/status/1427456820487016448 …
Sitting_on_my_Own added,
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @bespokecommie @WindReign and
NatSec executives have actively pushed to fill the US military with women/LGBT in my view to sabotage in advance the capacity for coup plotting in response to imperial decline. But yes, if they wanted to push this narrative I'm sure they could easily get Fox to pick it up.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Ya know what else sabotages the capacity for coup planning? Ruling well enough that potential plotters see the horrific costs of a switch as outweighing the potential benefits.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.