You mean the voter filled in the circle to vote for Trump, and ignored the down ballot choices, which were then check marked by a Democrat poll worker who also checked Biden.
-
-
Replying to @jwilliamkeech @soncharm
There's no evidence of that. What is more likely: that an voter messed up, or that an election worker went to a lot of trouble and risk to falsify one ballot for no gain?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The latter - except that there was no risk because they removed (R) poll watchers and continued to count votes. Once that happens any questionable matter has to be assumed to be fraud - when you first defeat audit measures every questionable item must be assumed fraudulent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Not an accurate description of election night (they all thought they were going home after 14-16 hours of work, but then the Secretary of State told them to stay, so the few people left reluctantly stayed behind to keep counting--nothing remotely suspicious about it).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Oh, you're either a paid shill or a liar.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Just someone who pays attention to facts rather than conspiracy websites.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You proposed an insane interpretation of events - all the (R) poll watchers got tired at the same time and just ... left. Except that the Sec State told a few (but not the (R) watchers) to stay and they did. Your own statement with nothing added concedes guilt.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You can believe conspiracy websites, or you can listen to the Trump-supporter who ran elections:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjKXvqSNIkk …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm going purely on what you wrote here. Your statement of facts establishes fraud. The video you just linked establishes fraud - at the 4:22 mark he admits that all observers have left as of 10:45 and counting went on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That's not fraud at all! It's an ordinary human endeavor where people try to go home after 16 hours of work, and then there is some confusion about who had to stay behind. Not fraud in any form or fashion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
When the "confusion" leads to votes being counted by partisans without observers present then the chain of custody is broken and fraud must be assumed because it's too easy to simply fake an "innocent" explanation for excluding adversarial watchers.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.