I’ve only read some of Yarvins stuff/not super familiar… Is he really that controversial? His ideas are far outside conventional thinking but I haven’t heard/read anything from him that I think a neutral/rational person would find “beyond the pale”
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"But what if the king is bad" is the usual objection. "Is this king you're imagining worse than what American democracy has delivered for the last 70 years? Would any king allow what happened to Detroit or LA or SF happen to one of his cities? Why would he?"
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.