Great thread (as always) by 17c here but I disagree with this assertion. The "problem" with evolution is that it has the ability to get trapped at local maxima - as long as a solution is good enough, it suffices. Progressivism is strengthened by evolved adaptations to it.https://twitter.com/17cShyteposter/status/1421369011841892352 …
-
-
Why did it fail? Because when the Rodney King case was going on the response wasn't "yes, they beat him for punitive reasons and this is required for a functioning society" - it was the good enough "uh, he was resisting". The good enough is what evolution cares about.
Show this thread -
The bigger fight was put off for another day and now the good enough has failed utterly - progs watch a woman get shot when literally attempting to plunge a knife into another woman and insist that's not enough justification for a cop exercising executive authority.
Show this thread -
This pattern is repeated on every progressive advance. Progressives destroy social order, the response is to figure out something progressives haven't gotten around to outlawing and use that to patch up the damage. Meanwhile progressive look at the patch and plan to eat that.
Show this thread -
Local school boards were an anti-progressive adaptation - now they're in the hands of progressives. Suburbs were an anti-progressive adaptation and there's section 8. Tech companies were anti-progressive adaptations to insane regulation and they're cordycepted.
Show this thread -
All of those were organic and evolved and all failed because the only solution is to break the power of the progressive egregore - not try to fix the damage it does.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.