Curtis' argument has 3 parts 1 Taking over school boards to "stop" CRT will fail 2 The reaction to this by the people who failed will be to accept it - learned helplessness 3 "CRT" can't be stopped without replacing the entire regime 2 is debatable - 1&3 are absolute truthhttps://twitter.com/Chowman30103166/status/1415786741051633664 …
-
-
I think Yarvin is right to a degree. Banning CRT will not make the educators abandon it just make it more weasel like in it's implementation. However you can't just let then run over everything. You have to mow the lawn or it gets out of control.
-
That would be great if you were actually "mowing the lawn" - in reality you're not. You're not reducing their resources, making them expend resources, siphoning resources to your group away from theirs, etc.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Anti-CRT is just one branch of many. I really do not understand the argument here. It's pretty much as the original tweet says. There is point A (Now) and point B (end of prog egregore). All the people talking about "ruling" what tangible action do they advocate?
-
It's like there is this belief in quantum politics where getting from point A to B is instanteous and doesn't require a line in-between it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.