Curtis' argument has 3 parts 1 Taking over school boards to "stop" CRT will fail 2 The reaction to this by the people who failed will be to accept it - learned helplessness 3 "CRT" can't be stopped without replacing the entire regime 2 is debatable - 1&3 are absolute truthhttps://twitter.com/Chowman30103166/status/1415786741051633664 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
#1 wrong. SB positions are worth running for and can be won we 100 votes. It's beyond just CRT. SBs decide on many other things including property taxes in most places. It's boring but it matters. Unless you're mounting a revolution (#3) organize, run & do the hard work.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @DudeMaximus
Is winning a school board position more significant than winning the Presidency? The argument isn't that you can't win a SB election - it's that a SB is powerless to oppose the bureaucracy in the long run. Is your school board going to replace Columbia Teacher's College?
4 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @DudeMaximus
Arn't Yarvin's prior recommendations basically secession? Wasn't formalism basically creating lots of nations of which one can vote with their feet? How is this not simply localism on steroids? And how does secession not accelerate this?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
He kicked around many ideas but the idea of localism was contingent on those localities being defensible. That was also a description of a world after the progressive egregore was defeated - not one where they get a patch and immediately start plotting.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.