I was thinking it already has as well. The only difference is, the incontrovertible evidence is being drowned out by all the propaganda on tv, radio, movies, and censorship.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @periposeidion
I thought we were just talking about genetics in general and not specifically GWAS.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @periposeidion
Basic group observations Sociologically, the "well ackshully its because of poverty etc" has been all but disproven at this point Just through deduction, only 1 theory is left. HBD and Murray have to be right.https://www.takimag.com/article/last-men-standing-charles-murray-vs-ibram-x-kendi/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @periposeidion
It's not incontrovertible genetic evidence in the sense that this was not proven through genetic manipulations & direct genetic experiments, but it's incontrovertible sociological evidence regarding genetics I just misunderstood what you meant originally with the word "genetics"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @periposeidion @walkthecat2
Why is that stronger proof than children of smart men and women killing it at math and science Olympiads?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
There will never be enough to satisfy anyone with that objection - that position is purely an excuse. No one holds the same belief about cow's milk production or horse speed and size, etc. - it's purely "you can't demonstrate x so x is what I need to see to believe this claim".
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.