You could see this in, for example, the ACIP proposal not to recommend an age-based approach to vaccine phasing, even though it would save more lives, because of “equity” concerns. Whatever woke nonsense is ongoing in press is much farther along in the health bureaucracy.
-
Show this thread
-
And then you had the bullshit about how, because ACIP hadn’t finalized the recommendation, it was improper to discuss it or something. Total “shut up, they explained” nonsense.
4 replies 42 retweets 578 likesShow this thread -
Actually the worst example was when public health academics decided to say en masse that gathering in groups last June was okay if it was done for the right political purposes, because pursuing a liberal policy agenda *is* public health.
95 replies 626 retweets 3,372 likesShow this thread -
Why would people “trust the science and listen to the experts” when the scientific experts keep smuggling their non-expert political and moral views into their guidance? Scientists who are mad the public doesn’t trust them should tell colleagues to stop discrediting their fields.
31 replies 391 retweets 1,973 likesShow this thread -
This letter from last June is so embarrassing — because it goes against the guidance these same experts gave about all other activity at the time.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Jyfn4Wd2i6bRi12ePghMHtX3ys1b7K1A/view …
25 replies 113 retweets 845 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @jbarro
You do know that the armed protestors were in enclosed buildings and unmasked whereas BLM was outside and mostly masked.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DRedecopp @jbarro
They ridiculed people protesting outdoors who wanted to go back to work and go to the beach too. Called them selfish people who will end up killing our loved ones. But said nothing about the social justice protests. Those were the only ones they hypocritically supported
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
The idea that officials said nothing about the protests being dangerous is an utter fiction. You people made up. In Chicago, the mayor and public health advocate both expressed concerns. Fauci also said they could lead to spread!https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/dr-fauci-protests-perfect-set-up-for-spreading-covid-19-2020-6%3famp …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I didn't say no one in the entire world condemned it. This is a straw man. There were many many health officials who condemned one set of protests and praised another. That is not arguable.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It is not arguable because it’s fiction. No public health official unequivocally praised the BLM protests. If they felt the cause was noble, they still felt they could lead to spread. They also did not want to provide cover for the violent break up of protests.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Fiction, eh?pic.twitter.com/m6zs6S1ZoM
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.