Okay, but that's not even what we were fucking talking about. We were talking about a trained woman fighting the "average man". Read.
-
-
Replying to @NOYOU46428536 @AFinLA
We were not. You were. Are you trying to say women are as strong as men?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BobFa66ot @AFinLA
"We"? You weren't in this thread until now. So yes, me and the other guy were talking about trained women against an average male. I'm saying that a woman who is trained in combat can best the average male.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @BobFa66ot @AFinLA
Auto correction, it was supposed to beat. But with that word change, you should make an educates guess based on my other comments.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @BobFa66ot @AFinLA

Keep your small-dick mentality, I'm at the point where I actually think men underestimating women actually benefits us.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
When you underestimate us, you don't come prepared.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NOYOU46428536 @AFinLA
If you had an army of all well trained men and an army of well trained women the men would win. The military is about winning wars not about equality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BobFa66ot @AFinLA
There are so many ways to fight wars that do not rely on strength. If you're still relying on hand to hand combat in war, then you're clearly inferior and not the best militarily.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
For example, you could use artillery:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwwMlfSEznE …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.