Nah, the likely implication is that hunter-gatherers don't give a shit about some WEIRD lame-ass psych bro's pieces of paper.
-
-
Replying to @RCownie @gcochran99 and
So you think if they were given incentives to get higher scores, that result would go away?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @TeaGeeGeePea @RCownie and
Not if its still from a "Psych Bro". You can be infinitely dismissive of anything administered by a species of "bro"; it's part of the scientific method.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aguy123452 @TeaGeeGeePea and
The contempt is earned.https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/11/psychologys-replication-crisis-real/576223/ …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RCownie @TeaGeeGeePea and
Yes, psychology is pretty crappy. But what the hell is a "psych-bro"? You used that term so that we would picture some popped collar lacrosse player. It's a stupid obnoxious trick.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aguy123452 @TeaGeeGeePea and
No, it's a *clever* obnoxious trick. For me, the image is that asshole Damore shitposting that his women colleagues are no damn good, abusing psych statistics to justify his misogyny, then endlessly whining about how he's just being science'y. YMMV.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RCownie @TeaGeeGeePea and
Right or wrong, he did not post that his female colleagues are no damn good. He tried to explain why their weren't more of them. The implication is clearly that those that are their are damn good. What's the point of such dishonesty? Is this a fight or a discussion?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aguy123452 @TeaGeeGeePea and1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @RCownie @TeaGeeGeePea and
Right, it says what I said it said.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aguy123452 @TeaGeeGeePea and
It says that women "on average" have various tendencies which are ill-suited for various Google jobs. Then goes on to say Google should stop affirmative action intended to get more women in those jobs. Big gap in the logic from "average" to "women at Google"
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Gap easily bridged by this amazingly advanced concept called the "normal distribution"pic.twitter.com/HU4kw4MJ3K
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.