>he would be better off fending for himself in a state of nature This only appears to be the case because anarcho-tyranny is the default mental framework. A "state of nature" man has no protection from being hunted for organs (or sport) other than his own guile - he's doomed.
-
-
That situation is one where there are competing primary property holders (i.e., state-like actors) - he gets to keep his secondary property because it's in the best interest of a primary property holder that he does so and that primary property holder protects him from rivals.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.