realistically they use very little bayesian math, the full extent of what they mean by “bayesianism” is that the bible is false and sodomy is good
-
-
Replying to @QuasLacrimas
Well, the insiders secretly know the math. (I wasted 3 years of my life using Bayes to show why the "Men can be women by means of saying so" language trick doesn't work & no one has any real objections, just—the moral didn't percolate out to the laymen)https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/onwgTH6n8wxRSo2BJ/unnatural-categories-are-optimized-for-deception …
2 replies 3 retweets 17 likes
Replying to @zackmdavis @QuasLacrimas
You can extend that model beyond categories - ethical systems that build in excuses for defection are optimized for ... defecting and denying that defection took place while implying to a confederate that you'd only defect on non-confederates.
5:57 PM - 15 Apr 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.