>It will be a virtually impossible sell to get even right-wing women back to a standard before the 1930’s. This is why there's no such thing as a right-wing woman. Coverture is necessary for civilization
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
The Romans say ‘hi.’ Worry about whether we are loyal to our people, respect men, and value motherhood, not whether our hemline is above or below our knee. A lot of Trad Christians fail the first one.pic.twitter.com/y82c43LCui
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @la_chatte_verte
I love and admire the Romans but Roman paganism died and almost took the whole civilization with it because of female sexual liberation and the resulting inability to have men and women bond to produce children. Few better men in history than J Caesar and he didn't leave sons.
2 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
Some people are just sterile. That's just bad luck. If this alleged "female sexual liberation" were the key factor, then Islam wouldn't have been floundering as a civilization for most of the past 700 years.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @la_chatte_verte @CovfefeAnon
Muslim societies at least notionally have one half of the civilizational puzzle (premarital chastity) but not the other half (monogamous marriage). Interestingly, this was also a serious issue for the late Republican and early (pre-Christian) Imperial Romans - see Augustan laws
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Lack of monogamous marriage creates enormous society-level sink for constructive male motivation - high-status married men remain in the eligible pool for unmarried women creating an intense intrasexual competition spiral, low status men are frozen out with no stake in the system
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
In a sense, premarital chastity (and to a lesser extent, public modesty/shaming culture) serve an analogous purpose, but from the other direction - tying sex and sexuality to marriage limits female intrasexual competition and redirects that energy into the household and family
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
To generalize, polygamy (or hypergamy if you prefer) is an expression of male sexual liberation like lack of premarital chastity is a form of female sexual liberation Both male and female sexual liberation act as sand in the gears of advanced division-of-labor-based civilization
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MetricReject @la_chatte_verte
Polygamy (society wide) isn't really male sexual liberation because there is no such thing as male sexual liberation. Men either form war bands and take brides from the next tribe over (possibly more than one) or they are dancing monkeys for women. Neither is liberation.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @MetricReject
Speaking of tribes, shouldn’t tribal men have low T per your theory since they literally see naked women all day, in some tribal situations, not just my legs between the ankles and knee? Those men aren‘t having their way with women non-stop and many women they see are off-limits.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Covfefe Anon Retweeted Covfefe Anon
Different species, different signals and reactions to them. The key point is the *change* - women today are sending signals to every man in visible range. Tribal women going around naked as they've done since the dawn of man aren't.https://twitter.com/CovfefeAnon/status/1378547989279600642 …
Covfefe Anon added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.