Anecdotal evidence for my claim:https://twitter.com/WAPLIQUOR/status/1382152306272071681 …
-
-
0:51Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
wouldn't the natural response be to try to get her number?
-
The natural response to a woman naked from the waist down isn't "get her number" (it's "get her horizontal, immediately")
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
FUCKING YOGA PANTS. CHRIST. JUST FUCKING BAN YOGA PANTS. WE HAVE GONE TOO FAR. THERE IS TOO MUCH ASS ON DISPLAY; MAKE IT ILLEGAL, GIVE US A REFUGE
End of conversation
-
-
-
The issue would have started long before if that were the causal factor. Its most likely environmental pollution.
-
Women's increasing public sexual displays have been growing rapidly over the last 70 years - which is exactly the timeframe for lowering T levels. More skin shown in 1970 than 1960 and by 2021 many women don't even own pants that fail to outline their labia.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Not through the roof but not showing the same decline. Another way to test it would be to look at T levels in pre and post revolutionary Tehran or Afghanistan. The reverse of all those pictures "this is what it used to be like here" from the 50s or so. All would be good tests.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I’m not against a return to a reasonable modesty. I think things started to fall apart in the 70’s. It will be a virtually impossible sell to get even right-wing women back to a standard before the 1930’s.
-
>It will be a virtually impossible sell to get even right-wing women back to a standard before the 1930’s. This is why there's no such thing as a right-wing woman. Coverture is necessary for civilization
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.