The apps cater to women's desire for high-status men and to men's desire for pussy or else they wouldn't work. The thing is, it's not really women ultimately winning here, it's the high-status men, who seem to carry no moral burden under this women win / men lose scenario.https://twitter.com/CovfefeAnon/status/1377504839513542656 …
-
-
Yes, it doesn't "work out" for women - but that's because women have self-destructive desires - them getting exactly what they want makes them miserable (eventually) Women didn't evolve in an environment where they had much sexual choice so of course their desires are misaligned
-
Neither did men, tbh.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Women are on dating apps to date, because that's the normative place to do it now. Women want to date men too. The problem is that the demand for sex will always outstrip the demand for relationships.
-
>that's the normative place to do it now It didn't fall from the sky and it wasn't a force of nature. It became the the "normative place" because it catered to female desire better than any other venue - how could it be any other way? If it was worse, women wouldn't sign up.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Women will follow high status men. It’s just this isn’t happening on Tinder. It’s not suited for that. It’s suited for matching based on looks, or a good photo.
-
Bullshit; put your money where your mouth is and make a dating app that has a strategy of filtering the men for high status and see if you can (1) sign them up and (2) if women follow. If you can, then great. That people with skin in the game didn't says you're wrong.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.