Liberals: let's master nature and control her to our ends. Conservatives: let's reconcile ourselves to nature (because she is all-powerful and we are fallen and humbled). Progs: let's liberate ourselves by ignoring or denying empirical reality and aiming at utopia.
-
-
Replying to @doukhobour @mmeJen and
To the liberal "mastering nature" includes destroying social institutions that are there to prevent social defection. Human nature is part of nature and the liberal is at eternal war with it. Looks exactly like the "progressive".
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @mmeJen and
russian peasant, gulag escape artist Retweeted James Lindsay, not Dr Rollergator
Liberalism is empirical. Liberationism (prog) is utopian. They are opposites, not the same! Liberals challenge necessity. This is their role. Hence, they question institutions. Conservatives defend necessity, hierarchy, nature. This is the balance.https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/status/1370378105651625987 …
russian peasant, gulag escape artist added,
James Lindsay, not Dr Rollergator @ConceptualJamesThe intentionally utopian character of liberationism, which is the conceptual basis of Wokeness at the practical level, isn't merely to be inferred. It's explicit. Marcuse's point here is that it's time for utopia! And he has a plan (subversion and Aufhebung of existing society). pic.twitter.com/NOm4xuFm5EShow this thread2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @doukhobour @mmeJen and
Liberalism is empirical right up until you start pointing out the empirical reality of human differences.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @mmeJen and
That is corruption. Liberalism has not always been anti-empirical. Fault also belongs to conservatives, who failed to curb liberalism's excesses. I do not see you blaming conservatives? Conservatives were corrupted by globalists and libertarians. This contributed to imbalance.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @doukhobour @CovfefeAnon and
I actually blame Christianity all the time for the problem you note. Universalist thinking has fundamental problems recognizing boundaries between human groups. Nationalism was what tempered liberalism and ‘kept it honest.’ Since 1945, liberalism is unbound.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @la_chatte_verte @doukhobour and
Christianity was the glue that held together Charles the Hammer's armies that drove out invaders It's a fantastic religion that has allowed centuries of productive, strong societies with a cooperate /cooperate mating market between men and women All reversed after discarding it
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @la_chatte_verte and
Christianity is also slobbering on the cock of woke. Why do you give Christianity a pass for its corruption but not liberalism?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @doukhobour @la_chatte_verte and
Liberalism has been eating away at Western Civ from the beginning. Christianity is the opposite; it stood as an anti-liberal bulwark for a long time but as it's been weakened by liberalism, wokeism has risen to fill the very real religious void.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @doukhobour and
Why can liberals appropriate Christianity so easily? Tell me how Christianity says that loyalty is a virtue that transcends abstract ideals? Tell me how Christianity says beauty is a real and powerful force in the world, and fair or not, it is not equitably distribute?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Here's how Christianity says beauty is a real and powerful force. Liberals didn't appropriate Christianity easily - they took centuries to undermine it.pic.twitter.com/Pz47ZoykMk
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.