What I want to argue is that 'lockdowns' can never be justified because any ostensible justification for them is *self-nullifying*, in the sense that it must necessarily invoke a context whose severity is such that the 'lockdown' would not help. But, I don't have the intelligence
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I tend to disagree - it's not actually hard to drive the virus to extinction and that USG and its clients can't because of an insane ideology is an indictment of them but there's no way to know for certain since every source of information is tainted.
-
-
who has driven it to extinction on a cost/benefit positive situation? who could sustain their policies for the next decade if necessary?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.