Arguing in good faith is dogmatically assuming my arbitrary leftist axioms.
-
-
-
We get accused of Bulverism but really the only interesting part left when discussing people with this extremely common attitude is trying to figure out the how and why. We both know they've already lost - motive is the only remaining question.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The best part is how he defines ‘debating in good faith’ as being willing to change your mind when presented with superior evidence, then immediately says he will hold some things as self evidently true and above debate. He can’t function without those unprincipled exceptions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.