Castro is making the correct point: the question of whether Trump's words legally constituted incitement to riot is a red herring. Trump's biggest crime is having convinced his followers that the election was being stolen, something that was itself culpable, and ended in violence
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @asymmetricinfo
Hate to break it to you, but most of us came to that conclusion through an evaluation of the evidence of ballot stuffing and yet to be explained statistical anomalies. Trump had nothing to do with it. You won't find any of that evidence on Tw*tter though. It's been fortified.
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @Flection20
And yet, Trump's lawyers never brought any of it into court. Did they not want to win their case?
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @asymmetricinfo @Flection20
This is such a hurr durr response. It's either done in bad faith or ignorance of legal process. It is nigh impossible to prove widespread voter fraud "in court" in our system. That's why we rely on voter fraud prophylactics. It's why dems eliminated those prophylactics.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ScalitoG @Flection20
They didn't offer any significant evidence, even while claiming that the evidence of fraud was clear and incontrovertible. That's not because they didn't want to provide clear and incontrovertible evidence. It's because they didn't have any that could stand up to cursory scrutiny
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Stripping away the processes that would generate evidence of tampering *is* fraud and that's exactly what was done and you know this. Everything coming out of a tainted process is tainted when it happens to go the way the tainters prefer.pic.twitter.com/Wvl37F5tQr
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.