Castro is making the correct point: the question of whether Trump's words legally constituted incitement to riot is a red herring. Trump's biggest crime is having convinced his followers that the election was being stolen, something that was itself culpable, and ended in violence
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @asymmetricinfo
Hate to break it to you, but most of us came to that conclusion through an evaluation of the evidence of ballot stuffing and yet to be explained statistical anomalies. Trump had nothing to do with it. You won't find any of that evidence on Tw*tter though. It's been fortified.
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @Flection20
And yet, Trump's lawyers never brought any of it into court. Did they not want to win their case?
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Flection20 @asymmetricinfo
Okay, I'll bite. Why did all of Trump's lawyers not want to win?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @districtyoder @asymmetricinfo
I was just memeing, but if you want a serious answer, it has more to do with the cultural/institutional reign of terror that spooked the court system from getting involved, for fear of the consequences (such as more mostly peaceful protests).
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Flection20 @asymmetricinfo
So you are saying Trump appointed judges are afraid of left wing protestors, and that is the reason why they threw all of Trump's 60 some cases put of court (besides one)? That's a conspiracy mind take.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
President doesn't appoint the state judges that didn't hold a single evidentiary hearing - they're elected in low turnout races that were given the same treatment that local "set rioters free" DA races were given. SC had a chance but Roberts (not T appointed) squashed it
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.