If Scott's playing to the second sort of audience, the McInnes thing was a serious slip up; people noticed it, and compared notes, and thought about what it says about his credibility. If he's playing to the first sort, we'll find that out quickly.
-
-
Point. It's ambiguous, but that's kind of on him for choosing to speak ambiguously.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Think I found what got you banned. (Deliberately being slightly cryptic, 'cause twitter:) It's a plausible argument. I agree the adaptation executors/fitness maximizers division is relevant, but it doesn't look to me like you were asserting that it wasn't.
-
Kind of looks like a case of making a plausible claim that sounds too much like a less plausible, very taboo claim.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.