Not getting into the details of the IQ distributions just taking your numbers from above - 42% of (white+Jewish) people with an IQ over 160 in the US are Jewish. The Jewish overrepresentation in this is more than 42% - you're actually arguing that cabinet officials are 160+ IQ?
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @jonatanpallesen and
I don't know if you saw my other threads but I've said repeatedly that it's not *only* IQ. There are clearly other cognitive/personality diffs btw Jews and gentiles that aren't well understood. Same selection pressures that selected for IQ must have selected for other stuff, too.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @nathancofnas @jonatanpallesen and
Now we're getting somewhere.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @jonatanpallesen and
I got there a long time ago. I can't stop people from interpreting what I say in a silly way.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @nathancofnas @jonatanpallesen and
Covfefe Anon Retweeted Nathan Cofnas
You say that but then in this very thread you put this. The situations aren't comparable and it looks like intentional deception when you assert they are.https://twitter.com/nathancofnas/status/1352053852858535936 …
Covfefe Anon added,
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @nathancofnas and
if group differences explain both, how is that deception?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NothingUserb @nathancofnas and
Because the important group differences that explain this aren't IQ differences and he implies that they are then immediately switches out of that argument when it's shown to be absurd without ever retracting.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
-
Replying to @NothingUserb @CovfefeAnon and
What is this x that explains both Jew-white gaps and white-black gaps in representation? Apparently it’s not IQ or verbal IQ. It can’t be IQ + ethnic patronage for Jews and IQ for whites; then it’s not the same reason. I don’t think he means it to be discrimination...
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @odhagan @CovfefeAnon and
I took it too mean a pancake stack of different group differences between Ashkenazi jews and whites(IQ, in-group preference, usually more urban, etc.)- not just IQ. "group differences" seemed broad enough to cover those.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
That's the most extreme motte and bailey imaginable. The broad position he started to stake out was about IQ - exclusively. The small position is literally what he's arguing against - that "other mental traits" (in-group preference, for example) are major factors.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @nathancofnas and
I don’t even think in-group preference is that strong in professional networks for whites, though. Blacks are more urban than whites so that’s not J>W>B. It’s not “the same reason” by any means.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.