What bothers me is that all this demonstrates a horrifying ignorance of how all this shit works and has for years. Tell me how *you* figure sending out unsolicited ballots would help, when you need ID and a billing history for a physical address to register to vote?
-
-
Already explained above. If you're trying to cheat mailing out ballots is a very easy way to do so because it gives you a checklist of names that have had ballots issued and didn't vote. Then you separate the envelops with signatures from the ballots and there's no way to check
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @Hexpatriot and
"Having had to show ID" at some time in the past is fake security when voter rolls aren't purged - you'd have to secure the ability to make entries to the rolls - which isn't even close to the case - a near impossible security task when multiple people can input data.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You'd think that one of the many state GOPs would have thought to check that, during any of the recounts, but I forgot, literally everyone is in on the conspiracy.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah, it's a crazy conspiracy theory to posit that the GOPe didn't like Trump - certainly not something you could read every day right here on twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"I didn't lose! Everybody cheated! The judges are out to get me! Shut up!" Is literally the closing villain dialogue from every non action film in the 80s, but sure. The GOP totally saw it as worth destroying their entire party and all losing their jobs because orange man bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
>The GOP totally saw it as worth destroying their entire party and all losing their jobs because orange man bad. Yes. That's exactly what happened.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Or, and stick with me on this, rather than both the GOP and DNC setting aside their differences in secret all to conspire to lose the election then getting half the admin, post office and every state senate on board with nobody talking, maybe the dude *famous* for lying, lied.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Lots of people did talk. There's video of election officials cheating. There's other video of election officials discussing cheating. There's video of them kicking out poll watchers and taping up cardboard to hide them doing counts. Hell, there's a postal worker who testified.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No there isn't. There's a postal worker and there is video of election officials. The other part is where we veer into wild fucking speculation and confuse it with the word evidence. The postal worker didn't "testify" as there was no case. He wildly speculated for dollars.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Multiple people submitted signed affidavits. That's testimony and there were zero evidentiary hearings - every case dismissed on procedural grounds.
-
-
So, hypothetically, if I offered, say, a million dollar reward for signed affidavits on the existence of bigfoot, and spread that to 330 million people for a month, you think I could get a couple takers?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.