You're asking me why you like lying? Weird.
-
-
Just pointing out the reason Rudy is going to be disbarred is because he never even alleged fraud in court, because it would have been immediately rebutted by the official records and thrown out. The claims of fraud universally demonstrate a horrifying ignorance of this stuff
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hexpatriot @CovfefeAnon and
To do what he's proposed would require faking millions of paper ballots then mailing them out from valid home addresses. It's fucking insane. They have the pieces of paper and they've checked everything repeatedly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, it wouldn't have *required* that. It would have required things that are much simpler. It required this impossible thing Thing was impossible Therefore, didn't happen but the first premise is wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ok, here's your big problem. You have got the electronic vote count. And then you have all the paper ballots with actual writing on them. Those numbers are nearly identical in every single case. Ergo, they would have needed to fake millions of physical ballots.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Only needed 4 cities to swing the election and the counts and recounts there were done w/o observers and w/o signature matching. There's video of ballots being pulled out from under a table and being counted without observers But don't worry - no court ever even considered that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Before we get into the crazed lies and utter bullshit surrounding "the evidence", please answer the broader question of how the minority democratic party managed to create presumably tens of millions of fake identities with social security numbers and credit records.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
They didn't have to. Your entire argument is a strawman "This way of doing it is impossible therefore it didn't happen" Yes, the way you described would have been difficult but there are other ways.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ok, there are 9 million more pieces of paper with Biden's name on it than Trump's. We should be able to agree on that, they have checked it repeatedly. So how do you think they did it? What's the latest theory?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hexpatriot @CovfefeAnon and
Can't count multiple times, those records would be red flagged in a recount instantly if the system even allowed it, which borders on impossibility.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You are making that up because it sounds nice. There are no guids on ballots. They can each easily be run through multiple times. There's no cryptographic security anywhere in the system and what provisions for security that were ordered (like keeping envelops) were ignored
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.