I sure did! So maybe you can tell me why it wasn't thrown out on substantive grounds? We can see if you're well informed too.
They didn't have to. Your entire argument is a strawman "This way of doing it is impossible therefore it didn't happen" Yes, the way you described would have been difficult but there are other ways.
-
-
Ok, there are 9 million more pieces of paper with Biden's name on it than Trump's. We should be able to agree on that, they have checked it repeatedly. So how do you think they did it? What's the latest theory?
-
Can't count multiple times, those records would be red flagged in a recount instantly if the system even allowed it, which borders on impossibility.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.