Sure. Was there evidence of the disputed election? I mean surely they presented it to court who took it seriously and didn't immediately throw it out as unsubstantiated bullshit, right? Can you even imagine?
-
-
Not a single evidentiary hearing took place. Nothing was thrown out on substantive grounds, only procedural ones. But you knew that because you're well informed, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
I sure did! So maybe you can tell me why it wasn't thrown out on substantive grounds? We can see if you're well informed too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
>surely they presented it to court who took it seriously and didn't immediately throw it out as unsubstantiated bullshit, right? You don't know that or don't care about truth because you stated that it was thrown as "unsubstantiated" - but no evidentiary hearings happened.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
And why was that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You're asking me why you like lying? Weird.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Just pointing out the reason Rudy is going to be disbarred is because he never even alleged fraud in court, because it would have been immediately rebutted by the official records and thrown out. The claims of fraud universally demonstrate a horrifying ignorance of this stuff
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Hexpatriot @CovfefeAnon and
To do what he's proposed would require faking millions of paper ballots then mailing them out from valid home addresses. It's fucking insane. They have the pieces of paper and they've checked everything repeatedly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No, it wouldn't have *required* that. It would have required things that are much simpler. It required this impossible thing Thing was impossible Therefore, didn't happen but the first premise is wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ok, here's your big problem. You have got the electronic vote count. And then you have all the paper ballots with actual writing on them. Those numbers are nearly identical in every single case. Ergo, they would have needed to fake millions of physical ballots.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Only needed 4 cities to swing the election and the counts and recounts there were done w/o observers and w/o signature matching. There's video of ballots being pulled out from under a table and being counted without observers But don't worry - no court ever even considered that
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.