> any tiny minority that lives within an alien society *has* to be hostile to the majority society True, there's certainly a dynamic at play there.
-
-
Replying to @RokoMijic @CovfefeAnon
But that "hostility" can take many different forms from Amish to Jews to Mormons to Scientology to primitive tribes to etc. It's just whatever ensures genetic and memetic separation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RokoMijic @RokoMijicUK
Amish go out of their way to live apart from the wider society so aren't selected for hostility. Same for Mormons.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
Well, that apartness is a form of hostility. You can say the same about all sorts of other groups. Including white people - over time, white people will get selected for racism (the nonracist whites will stop being white). This in itself isn't a problem.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RokoMijic @RokoMijicUK
If you immersed whites in a situation where they were under 5% of the population, sure. Even then you wouldn't expect genetically distant races / species that evolved under different mating market pressures to have frequent pairings. US whites have near zero SSA genetics.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
right, but over time selection will take hold, some will interbreed, some won't, and the ones who don't will be genetically selected for racism. It's inevitable, it's essentially a mathematical tautology.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RokoMijic @RokoMijicUK
Africans were subject to vastly different selective pressures and (as seen from the past) in a more natural mating market there simply isn't much pairing off. You don't need hostility as a barrier if the races diverged in what was selected for.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
you'll get some of it over time, and also with other races asian, etc). You can't criticize the ultimate gnon-nes of Judaism. In order to exist over a long time period, anything has to have a self-preservation drive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Not criticizing that at all - just pointing out the implications. It's not about survival and reproductive fitness are necessary but not being dissolved is also necessary and not being dissolved has implications - it imposes restrictions on possible solution spaces.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.