how come there are judges for the law, but only lawyers for many other important questions that people disagree about
Everyone is a history judge - even merely choosing to accept some particular person or institution's pronouncements is a standard of judging. There are no specific concrete results that turn on those judgement so it comes down to belief by everyone who knows of the conflict.
-
-
so basically just a distributed executioner
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.