Yeah but you're saying women want to just fuck right away. Maybe underclass ones? I don't know. But the entire field of female psychology puts that as a resounding No lol
-
-
Replying to @17cShyteposter @RokoMijicUK and
Yes, if a woman doesn't want to fuck right away she's never getting there with x number of "dates" - the desire is there immediately or never and men know this. She might prefer being held in suspense about his attraction to her but that's not the issue.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @RokoMijicUK and
Nah, she wants to make the man prove it. This is what literally a million romance novels make explicitly clear. You'll never convince me that some blog theory is more correct than what all women ever repeatedly tell infinite stories to express Imagine denying that market outcome
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @17cShyteposter @RokoMijicUK and
Women maximally prefer men to "prove it" but men she's actually attracted to don't cooperate. It's like asking a woman about what she finds attractive - she'll give an answer about all the traits she wishes a man she was already attracted to has - not traits that attract her.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @RokoMijicUK and
I mean, again, literally fifty million romance novels written, edited, and read entirely by women telling you exactly what unlocks their innermost keys, but sure, a blog theory is more accurate than the market
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @17cShyteposter @RokoMijicUK and
There's a vast gulf between a world set up for her maximum pleasure and how she acts in this one - not about the nature of the men she finds attractive but in how they *actually* treat her and how she *actually* reacts. She has hidden information about the men in romance novels
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @17cShyteposter and
That hidden information means he can act in ways she would find repulsive in reality (such as not sexually escalating) because she doesn't fill in the blank with "wow, he's a real pussy" - she gets access to info that demolishes that assumption.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @RokoMijicUK and
This is true—the literally definition of a romance novel is a "happily ever after," where they wind up man and wife All romance novels are a "Heroine's Journey": she tests the man, remaining as passive as possible, for 200 pages until he proves himself Worthy of knocking her up
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @17cShyteposter @RokoMijicUK and
Yep. Romance novel authors can directly and unambiguously describe a man's traits just by writing them on the page. In this world every internal trait is inferred by signalling. Sometimes the signalling conflicts with what she ideally prefers but the signaling has to win.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @17cShyteposter and
She loses if he turns to another woman OR if he sleeps with her too quickly and doesn't fall in love. Shouldn't she delay as long as needed to make him think he is gaining something valuable but not so long as to make him turn away?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Assumption there is that men are reading signals from women of chasteness and the only way he can do so is if she directly shows it. Men are much more likely to read it as a signal that he's in the "play nice, marriage candidate" bucket and not in the "oooh, want him" bucket
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.