My "specific brand of lunacy" is looking in a search engine for a factual matter that is public record. I wouldn't do this on the NY Times' page because they are a publisher that makes an editorial decision not to publish that information - this apparently also applies to google
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Florida is the interesting one there.
End of conversation
-
-
-
I don’t think the designation as a publisher thing is what we think it will be. Otherwise why would the Biden campaign also be urging for the repeal of section 230 and classification of Soc. Media as publisher so that they could more aggressively police speech?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's a comfy blood pact with politicians They protect the big tech monopoly in exchange for which big tech censors their political rivals and pushes their narratives on the populace
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.