Wokism is really bad, in my view. And dangerous. But right now, I'm a lot more worried about the destruction of the sacred norms of our democratic republic. Trump has already likely succeeded in forever tarnishing this election; many will always consider it stolen.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @EPoe187
So it's a "sacred norm" never to dispute election results? Since when?
2 replies 0 retweets 54 likes -
Replying to @EpektasisJohn @EPoe187
U absolutely can. But u need evidence for it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The egregore settling on this point is hilarious. "No evidence has been presented in court of fraud" before the court cases. Don't worry, they'll present plenty of evidence for fraud and have already done so. You'll have to update your script soon.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
There’s another point. Is the evidence legitimate and substantiated? Trump has been losing his lawsuits.https://www.google.com.mx/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/4942e1b5-e445-476d-9d80-6b51777939a9 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Even if he loses every lawsuit, it doesn't seem reasonable to demand that your allegations must be proven correct, or you're not allowed to make them. How could you ever have that certainty in advance?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
If courts operated on progressive epistemology every case would immediately be dismissed because the case was not decided when the suit was filed
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.