Wikipedia is useful for lots of things but mainly it's a great refutation of the concept of a "marketplace of ideas" - the tech-libertarian conception of wiki had people competing individually to produce good articles and good edits would drive out bad. 1/2
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @parallaxoptics
Instead it fell under the control of an group of people who played as a team to support one another in making ideologically motivated edits. So many lessons there. 2/2
2 replies 3 retweets 31 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Metahacking of the marketplace of ideas. First, install insane epistemology in almost everyone - "always and only accept consensus ideas by reputable institutions" Second, infiltrate and dominate every imaginable reputable institution and set the consensus yourself
1 reply 5 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @MeltedJonSnow and
Third, FUBAR the reputation of the infiltrated organization.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Sure, but reputation in whose eyes? Nearly a century after Walter Duranty the NYT is still considered reliable (and it is in a lot of ways - they don't tell direct lies preferring to use other methods of deceit)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.