Attempting to pressure a payment processor or (certain kinds of) marketplace / publisher to drop clients for political reasons becomes tortious interference, racketeering and fraud
-
-
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @0x49fa98 and
(conspiracy rather than fraud, but hey fraud isn’t a bad idea, make any lies or misleading statements made in service of tortious interference felony fraud)
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Because the regulations are the cause of Woke Capital. What happens when you "regulate" them "into oblivion"? They suck up to the regulators and the regulators are happy when they push wokeness.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Right. Is NPR less woke than CNN? Purge NPR, show that a right-leaning congress can choose to have a right-leaning corp for public broadcasting, and then we can talk about legally-enforced Based Nabisco and Based Hollywood
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
There's a scale that goes: Enforced wokeness -> free market -> enforced basedness Right now we're at the left point and moving towards the middle makes things better for us even if we desire the point on the right. The market would likely enforce enough basedness anyway.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Admittedly part of the problem (idk if true for Welt) is a lot of rw catholics are beholden to lw catholics who think that the Civil Rights Act is holier than communion. Their conception of “free enterprise” cannot extend to include letting local communities regulate themselves
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
rgdls, we may agree on fundamentals: i see escape from octopus-quagmire of corporate oppression as return to community control & see that as continuous with freely chosen association, you prolly want something similar but think it is consistent w/ ctrl of local by public corps
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @rhizostigmata and
v rich families & v powerful corporations r not-rly-gr8 byproduct of allowing families to care for members, cooperate to accomplish things. slapping them here & there fine; but trying to abolish hacks away root w/o even solving problem (gets more oligarchy/corporatism, not less)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Creating systems that can destroy wealth concentrates power and wealth with whoever captures control of those systems. Selects for socially harmful traits rather than socially beneficial ones.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.