I want: 1) tit-for-tat against all cos. (incl FB) for indiv censorship events, 2) asymmetric burdens for companies that are more biased in application (like Twitter, comp to FB), 3) deregulation of economy & media in gen, 4) contingency plan to break up or natl’ze social media
-
-
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @0x49fa98 and
Zuckerberg’s time is valuable, if he has to testify to the Senate every time FB censors a RWer this stops fast
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @0x49fa98 and
Also a blind political litmus for payment processors and certain marketplaces / publishers, you cannot take clients on the terrorism/trafficking watchlist and cannot exclude clients any other clients for political reasons
3 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @0x49fa98 and
Attempting to pressure a payment processor or (certain kinds of) marketplace / publisher to drop clients for political reasons becomes tortious interference, racketeering and fraud
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @0x49fa98 and
(conspiracy rather than fraud, but hey fraud isn’t a bad idea, make any lies or misleading statements made in service of tortious interference felony fraud)
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Because the regulations are the cause of Woke Capital. What happens when you "regulate" them "into oblivion"? They suck up to the regulators and the regulators are happy when they push wokeness.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Do that before you hand more power to the leftists who will use their power to entrench themselves deeper.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Think of the forces involved and how institutions work when doing things like this.
This
is from an interview with Angelo Codevilla.pic.twitter.com/o90XgBRnyd
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.