But it doesn't open the way for friendlier competition specifically because the competition will also get taken over by that faction. Want to solve that? Get rid of "hostile workplace" laws. Purge the federal bureaucracy. Purge the universities. https://twitter.com/Shamun54826774/status/1318560901470052352 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
Exactly. The answer is less regulation, not more
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @rhizostigmata @CovfefeAnon
Even a stopped clock, etc. Progressives win by manipulating procedural outcomes. Less regulation = more fragmentation, procedural outcomes are harder to manipulate.
3 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @apex_simmaps @rhizostigmata and
I think wisdom here is to admit it’s not clear whether social media alternatives fail to arise because of standard monopoly, network externalities, conspiracy against replacements (eg by payment processors), regulatory burden on small cos., or something else entirely
3 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @QuasLacrimas @rhizostigmata and
Frankly most of these companies are losing money and sustain their existence as VC hobby projects, subsidized propaganda mouthpieces, and conduits for securities fraud. Possibly there isn’t a true economic reason for lack of competition at all
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
That's probably the case for something like youtube. It's hard to create a profitable youtube competitor because youtube isn't profitable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.