Don't gore the cape, gore the matador. Facebook isn't an arm of the (D) party - a faction within facebook controls the company because it has the backing of the state. Giving the state more levers of control over tech companies does the opposite of solving this problem.https://twitter.com/josh_hammer/status/1318318690413154304 …
-
Show this thread
-
Covfefe Anon Retweeted
But it doesn't open the way for friendlier competition specifically because the competition will also get taken over by that faction. Want to solve that? Get rid of "hostile workplace" laws. Purge the federal bureaucracy. Purge the universities. https://twitter.com/Shamun54826774/status/1318560901470052352 …
Covfefe Anon added,
This Tweet is unavailable.4 replies 0 retweets 19 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
Exactly. The answer is less regulation, not more
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @rhizostigmata @CovfefeAnon
Even a stopped clock, etc. Progressives win by manipulating procedural outcomes. Less regulation = more fragmentation, procedural outcomes are harder to manipulate.
3 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
gritcult.eth (last week at NFT.NYC) Retweeted gritcult.eth (last week at NFT.NYC)
regulation isnt a flat surface area... the fact that corporations can grow endlessly is the larger problem increasing legislation that limits corporations but decreasing regulation for individuals is a much better solution 2 pronged approachhttps://twitter.com/GRITCULT/status/1105873408380817409?s=20 …
gritcult.eth (last week at NFT.NYC) added,
gritcult.eth (last week at NFT.NYC) @GRITCULTReplying to @tato_tweets @LogoCentrifuge and 3 othersI'm against corporations. Doing business should be limited to the individual as much as possible. Corporations as entities, I agree are not persons. The same thing can be said for governmental entities. But this is where the notion of "voluntary exchange" comes in1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
"Against corporations" is rank insanity. All economic and technological development of the past say 500 years has been due to being able to structure enterprises in the form of corporations. They're tools for cooperation.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
tools,sure, but cooperation =/= corporation is my main point.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
They're a tool that enables large scale cooperation that would be impossible without that tool. It's a tool that allows fine grained control of how you structure and divide risk when dealing with non-family members.
-
-
i totally disagree on the notion on it being "impossible" corona has shown that decentralised cooperation is possible. the best thing about a corporation is its hierarchy system. i think for some systems you dont need this structure.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.