But now we are devolving back toward lowbrow identity-based sentimentalism: For instance, you are now supposed to be able to tell at a glance that these crooks resisting arrest are really the good guys, despite their behavior, because they are black.https://www.takimag.com/article/slaughter-in-the-cities/ …
-
-
Replying to @Steve_Sailer
“..devoted to lowlifes like Arbery” was a weird statement to read seeing that he was out jogging, to my knowledge, and was followed by 2 people(one with a gun) who had no reason to approach him?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lightning2135 @Steve_Sailer
Your knowledge is wrong and at this point accepting the millionth consecutive collapsed narrative also implies that your ability to notice patterns is severely lacking and that lack may prove be fatal in other areas of life such as dealing with hot stoves and open windows
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @Steve_Sailer
All that word salad made of baseless claims could’ve been spent providing one sentence of refuting evidence. You instead opted for ad-hom attacks You’re a genius and see all patterns, we get it. That’s why you’re anonymous and broke like the rest of us.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
why Retweeted why
The Arbery case is the one case where there is little evidence that he deserved death in anyway. The others listed in the article - I can understand. Arbery checked out a construction site a few times and touched nothing, that doesn’t warrant death.https://twitter.com/Lightning2135/status/1316996425817989120?s=20 …
why added,
why @Lightning2135Replying to @Lightning2135 @Steve_SailerOn top of that he was spotted previously. He stole nothing, damaged nothing, they followed him with guns, blocked his path, directed him to stop with no authority to do so....yet he was the problem? Even if you want to hold his past against him, it played no part in his death. pic.twitter.com/p3BIELNNVc1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Lightning2135 @Steve_Sailer
Oh, "there's no evidence he stole anything *that day*"? Really? Do you think you're fooling anyone? Do you think everyone else fails to notice the narrative collapse on every one of these "the poor black got killed just for attacking someone armed while committing a felony"?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @Steve_Sailer
You’re evading the point because you don’t have refuting evidence. The cops have clarified that he was unarmed and security footage has showed that he hasn’t stolen or damaged anything. “Fooling anyone” is it really that hard to say “this guy didn’t deserve to die”?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes, there’s a problem with the running narrative that every black man is innocent. But no need to play dumb as though each case is the same and there are no outliers. You literally have no evidence that he did anything to deserve being followed and killed.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I like how you tried to input *that day* as though to say you have evidence that he’s stolen something from the construction site before. You’re almost as bad as the left when it comes to letting a narrative dictate your thinking on individual cases. Use facts not feelings
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I could point out that it's your source that uses the lawyerly parsing of "no evidence he was stealing that day" to avoid getting caught in a lie but that's besides the point. Lowlife scum is dead. No one cares.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.